Coastal Sharks

Life History

Costal Sharks

Research technician Erin Voigt, measures a juvenile shark, as part of the University of North Carolina Coastal Shark Survey Cruise, Morehead City, NC. Photo credit: Mike Waine.

Sharks belong to the class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish) that also includes rays, skates, and deepwater chimaeras (ratfishes). Relative to other marine fish, sharks have a very low reproductive potential. The low reproductive rate is due to sharks slow growth, late sexual maturity, one to two-year reproductive cycles, a small number of young per brood, and specific requirements for nursery areas. These biological factors leave many species of sharks vulnerable to overfishing.

Sharks have internal fertilization and the embryo of most species spend their entire developmental period protected within their mother's body, although some species lay eggs. Females produce a small number (2 - 25) of large pups, which have an increased chance of survival due to their size. Adults usually congregate in specific areas to mate and females travel to specific nursery areas to pup. These nursery areas are discrete geographic areas, usually in waters shallower than those inhabited by the adults. Frequently, the nursery areas are in highly productive coastal or estuarine waters where abundant small fish and crustaceans provide food for the growing pups. These shallow areas have fewer large predators than deeper waters, thus enhancing the chances of survival of the young sharks.

Sharks are a vital part of ocean ecosystems all over the world. Scientists consider them to be a keystone species because they generally reside at the top of the food chain having a strong impact on other species either directly or indirectly. Removing or reducing shark populations in an area can cause an imbalance in the food chain and produce far reaching negative impacts. Because of this, the health of shark populations in an ecosystem is often an accurate indicator of the overall health of the system.

Commercial & Recreational Fisheries

Costal Sharks

In the mid-1980s, sharks were considered an underutilized resource and fishermen were encouraged to fish for them. Over the next few years, fishing effort increased considerably and the impact of unregulated harvest was beginning to take its toll on some shark species. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) stepped in to manage these species followed by the Commission with complementary measures.

The commercial shark fishery is generally concentrated in the Southeastern U.S. and Gulf of Mexico. The Atlantic fishery targets both large coastal shark (LCS) and small coastal shark (SCS) species with bottom longline as the primary commercial gear, followed by gillnets. An Atlantic bottom longline is 3.4 miles in length on average and contains about 300 hooks. Skates, other sharks, or various finfish are used as bait. The gear typically consists of a heavy monofilament mainline with lighter weight monofilament gangions, or branch lines, coming off the main line. The Southeast shark gillnet fishery is comprised of several vessels based primarily out of ports in northern Florida. Vessels typically use nets ranging from 456 to 2,280 meters long and 6.1 to 15.2 meters deep, with about 5.2 inches of stretched mesh.

In 2016, commercial LCS landings were approximately 465,937 pounds dressed weight (dw), a 25% decrease from 2015, while landings of SCS species in 2016 were approximately 210,067 pounds dw, a 41% decrease from 2015. Total U.S. landings of Atlantic pelagic shark species were 239,655 pounds dw in 2016, an 11% increase from 2015, which is largely attributed to the increase in landings of thresher and shortfin mako sharks.  2016 was the first year that smoothhound landings came under management, with commercial landings estimated at 701,727 pounds dw.

The recreational fishery for Atlantic sharks occurs in federal and state waters from New England to the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Once called “the poor man’s marlin,” recreational shark fishing is now a popular sport at all social and economic levels, largely due to accessibility to the resource. Sharks can be caught by rod and reel virtually anywhere in saltwater, with even large specimens available to surf anglers or small boaters in the nearshore area. Most recreational fishing takes place from small to medium-size vessels. SCS species such as Atlantic sharpnose, bonnethead, and finetooth comprise the majority of the recreational harvest. Short-fin mako and common thresher sharks are generally accessible only to those aboard ocean-going vessels.

Not inlcuding smoothhound sharks, 70,000 sharks were harvested druring the 2016 recreational fishing season in the Atlantic region, compared to 72,000 sharks landed in 2015. The SCS complex largely dominated the recreational shark fishery. In 2016, approximately 55,650 sharks from the SCS complex were recreationally harvested, a 67% increase from 2015. Sharpose sharks represented 84% of the 2016 SCS harvest. The LCS complex, including hammerheades, had 3,366 sharks harvested in 2016. The peklagic sharks complex had 10,789 harks harvested in 2016, a drecrease of 69% from 2015. Approximately 22,073 smoothhound sharks ere recreationally harvested in the Atlantic region.

Stock Status

Costal Sharks

Stock status is assessed by species complex or by species group for species without enough data for an individual assessment. In summary, 14 species have been assessed domestically, three species have been assessed internationally and 28 species have not yet been assessed. Most of the species that have been assessed and all of those that have not been assessed require a benchmark stock assessment due to new data, changing information on stocks and improved assessment methodologies. The accompanying table outlines the stock status of each species or species group.

The North Atlantic shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) stock was assessed by ICCAT SCRS in 2017. It determined that the stock is overfished and overfishing is occurring. In response, NOAA Fisheries established voluntary commercial and recreational measures to reduce fishing mortality until an emergency rulemaking takes place to determine final regulations for the second half of 2017.

In 2016, an update to the dusky shark stock assessment was completed; results indicate the stock remains overfished and overfishing is occurring. In response, NOAA Fisheries approved Amendment 5b to implement a range of federal management measures to achieve a 35% mortality reduction relative to 2015 levels, and rebuild the dusky shark stock by the year 2107.

In 2015, a benchmark stock assessment (SEDAR 39) was conducted for the smoothhound shark complex, including smooth dogfish, the only species of smoothhound occurring in the Atlantic. The assessment indicates smooth dogfish is not overfished and not experiencing overfishing.

Also in 2015, the North Atlantic blue shark (Prionace glauca) stock was assessed by ICCAT SCRS. The assessment indicated the stock is not overfished and not experiencing overfishing. However, scientists acknowledge there is a high level of uncertainty within the assessment; therefore, results should be interpreted with caution.  

SEDAR 34 assessed the Atlantic sharpnose (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae) and bonnethead (Sphyrna tiburo) sharks in 2013. The Atlantic sharpnose stock is not overfished and not experiencing overfishing. The status of bonnethead shark stocks (Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico) is unknown. A benchmark assessment for both stocks is recommended.

A 2011 benchmark assessment (SEDAR 21) of dusky (Carcharhinus obscures), sandbar (Carcharhinus plumbeus), and blacknose (Carcharhinus acrontus) sharks indicates that both dusky and blacknose sharks are overfished and experiencing overfishing. Sandbar sharks continued to be overfished. As described in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NOAA Fisheries must establish a rebuilding plan for an overfished stock. As such, the rebuilding date for dusky sharks is 2108, sandbar sharks is 2070, and blacknose sharks is 2043. The Commission's Coastal Sharks Management Board approved the assessment for management use in 2012, and NOAA Fisheries’ Highly Migratory Species Division (HMS) is incorporating the assessment results as part of Amendment 5a and 5b to its FMP. Amendment 5a addresses sandbar and blacknose sharks, as well as scalloped hammerhead and Gulf of Mexico blacktip. Amendment 5b addresses dusky sharks.

Porbeagle sharks (Lamna nasus) were assessed by ICCAT SCRS in 2009, which found that while the Northwest Atlantic stock is increasing in biomass, it is considered to be overfished with overfishing not occurring. NOAA Fisheries established a 100-year rebuilding plan for porbeagle sharks; the expected rebuilding date is 2108.

A 2009 stock assessment for the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico populations of scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) indicated the stock is overfished and experiencing overfishing. This assessment was reviewed by NOAA Fisheries and deemed appropriate to serve as the basis for U.S. management decision. In response, NOAA Fisheries established a scalloped hammerhead rebuilding plan that will end in 2023.

In 2007, SEDAR 13 assessed a number of species including the SCS complex and finetooth (Carcharhinus isodon) sharks. The peer reviewers considered the data to be the ‘best available at the time’ and determined the status of the SCS complex to be ‘adequate.’ Finetooth sharks were found to be not overfished and not experiencing overfishing.

SEDAR 11 assessed the LCS complex and blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) in 2006. The assessment suggested that it is inappropriate to assess the LCS complex as a whole due to the variation in life history parameters, population dynamics, and catch and abundance data among the LCS species. Based on these results, NOAA Fisheries changed the status of the LCS complex from overfished to unknown. As part of SEDAR 11, blacktip sharks were assessed as two separate populations — Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic. The results indicated that the Gulf of Mexico stock is not overfished and not experiencing overfishing, while the current status of blacktip sharks in the Atlantic region is unknown.

Atlantic Coastal Management

In the mid-1980s, sharks were considered an underutilized resource and fishermen were encouraged to fish for them. Over the next few years, fishing effort increased considerably and the impact of unregulated harvest was beginning to take its toll on some shark species. In the early 1990s, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) implemented a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Sharks of the Atlantic Ocean to rebuild depleted stocks and protect healthy stocks from overfishing. In 2008, the Commission adopted an Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Coastal Sharks (and subsequently Addenda I-IV) to complement federal management actions and increase protection of pregnant females and juveniles in inshore nursery areas. The FMP regulates 40 different species of coastal sharks found on the Atlantic coast.

Addendum I, approved in 2009, modified recreational possession limits for smoothhound dogfish and other species, allowed at-sea processing of smooth dogfish from March - June, and removed the two-hour net check requirements, which was determined to be ineffective at reducing bycatch. Addendum II and Addendum III (2013) addressed changes in the federal management of coastal sharks. Addendum II allocated state-shares of the smoothhound dogfish coastwide quota, and modified the maximum fin-to-carcass ratio, consistent with the Shark Conservation Act of 2010. Addendum III created two new species groups (Hammerhead and Blacknose) and increased the recreational size limit for hammerheads. Addendum IV allows smooth dogfish carcasses to be landed with corresponding fins removed from the carcass as long as the total retained catch, by weight, is composed of at least 25 percent smooth dogfish, consistent with federal management measures.

In 2017, the Board approved a fishery opening date of January 1, 2018 and a variable possession limit, which will start at 25 fish per vessel per trip for those species within the aggregated large coastal sharks (LCS) species group (silky, tiger, blacktip, spinner, bull, lemon, nurse) and the hammerhead species group (scalloped hammerhead, great hammerhead, smooth hammerhead) for 2018. Effective July 18, 2018, the retention limit will be increased for the LCS and hammerhead shark management groups from 3 to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip. The revised retention limit will remain in effect for the rest of the 2018 fishing season or until NMFS announces another adjustment to the retention limit.

In March 2018, in response to new information that shortfin mako sharks are overfished and experiencing overfishing, NOAA Fisheries implemented emergency regulations to reduce catch and fishing mortality. These regulations apply to:

  • Any commercial fishermen with a highly migratory species (HMS) permit who interacts with shortfin mako sharks

  • Any recreational fishermen with an HMS permit who catches or targets shortfin mako sharks

  • Any tournament that has a prize category for shortfin mako sharks

  • Any dealer who buys or sells shortfin mako sharks or products.

The emergency rule regulations include the following:

Commercial measures: Live release of shortfin mako sharks in the commercial pelagic longline fishery and no landings of shortfin mako sharks by fishermen using other commercial gear types.

Recreational measures: Minimum size of 83 inches (210 cm) fork length for shortfin mako sharks.

Please note both commercial and recreational measures listed above apply in federal waters and HMS permit holders must abide by them whether they are fishing in state or federal waters. For more information, please visit   

In May 2018, after considering updates on shortfin mako sharks, the Board initiated an addendum to allow states to change management measures, such as adjusting minimum size limits, through Board action. This action was taken to respond to changes in federal regulations more quickly than the current FMP allows. In August, the Board will consider approval of the Draft Addendum for public comment.

Meeting Summaries & Reports

Board Proceedings

Advisory Panel Meeting Summaries